THEY
VALIDATED US
and we are proud!
Interested in exploring how Videolab
could support research or teaching at your institution?
Academic evidence & research
Videolab is not just a teaching tool but a research-proven platform that supports modern medical education. Studies across Europe highlight how video-enabled feedback, consultation analysis, and simulation debriefing empower both learners and educators to achieve measurable improvements in patient-centred communication and clinical competence. By combining robust privacy safeguards with flexible integration into educational workflows, Videolab enables institutions to innovate without compromising compliance.
4 CATEGORIES
Video-recording in real consultations
and clinical encounters
National review of NHS policies and patient perspectives on routine surgical video recording
Yiu A, Lam K, Simister C, Silver A, Hicks C, Vass M, Kinross J (2025)
A review of all 144 NHS trusts and boards in England and Wales found that 70% have no policies governing surgical video recording, use, or storage and those that do address consent inconsistently and rarely cover data minimisation or storage duration. Patients strongly support video for education (94.5%), research (94.9%), and quality assurance (92.5%). The paper calls for governance frameworks that match modern recording practice.
Adoption of routine surgical video recording: a nationwide Freedom of Information Act request across England and Wales
Yiu A, Lam K, Simister C, Clarke J, Kinross J (2024)
A nationwide Freedom of Information request to every NHS trust and Welsh health board found that only 15.7% routinely record surgical procedures on video, with governance, consent, and storage practices varying widely — the baseline gap the 2025 Yiu et al. policy review (already on this page) was written to address.
Candidate perceptions of the UK Recorded Consultation Assessment: cross-sectional data linkage study
Botan V, Laparidou D, Phung VH, Cheung P, Freeman A, Wakeford R, Denney M, Law GR, Siriwardena AN (2022)
Links candidates' perceptions of the MRCGP Recorded Consultation Assessment — a licensing exam built entirely on submitted video-recorded consultations — to their actual performance data, offering real-world evidence on how trainees experience being assessed on video.
Exploring typologies of consultation performance using authentic clinical experiences
Timmerman A, Oerlemans M, van der Vleuten C, Pawlikowska T, Ram P, Muris J. (2022)
From 80 real videotaped GP-trainee consultations, 20 supervisors mapped performance onto four recognisable typologies (from the "novice empathic doctor" to the "knowledgeable but unsympathetic" one) turning authentic recordings into a concrete developmental road map for feedback.
Understanding healthcare providers’ experiences with video recording of patient consultations
Pedersen CG, Høstrup H, Bro F, Bjerrum L, Høst D, Felding SA, et al. (2022)
Across 8 cardiac-rehab services and 335 self-recorded consultations, clinicians shifted from fearing exposure to valuing video as "a new learning dimension" showing that provider-led recording, not just researcher-led, drives professional growth.
Video-based feedback using real consultations for formative assessment
Dohms MC, Collares CF, Tibério IC. (2020)
In a controlled study of 54 primary-care residents, video feedback from their own real consultations significantly raised self-perceived empathy and opened deeper self-assessment and reflection.
Training residents in patient-centred communication and empathy
Noordman J, Post B, van Dartel AAM, Slits JMA, Olde Hartman TC, van Dulmen S, et al. (2019)
A 3-day program built on video review of residents' own consultations raised patient-rated empathy significantly (137 patients) and improved observed computer use — with video feedback the most-valued element.
Video training with peer feedback in real-time consultation
Eeckhout T, Gerits M, Bouquillon D, Schoenmakers B. (2016)
Feasibility and acceptability of recording GP trainees’ real patient consultations was assessed. 70% of GP trainees rated video-recorded consultations positively. They valued the impact on communication skills, confirming feasibility in daily practice.
Assessing communication quality of consultations in primary care: initial reliability of the Global Consultation Rating Scale
Burt J, Abel G, Elmore N, Campbell J, Roland M, Benson J, Silverman J (2014)
The GCRS (built on the Calgary-Cambridge Guide) achieves reliability of 0.80 with 3 raters and 0.85 with 4 raters, rising further once rater bias is corrected for — a validated instrument for rating real-world GP communication quality directly from video recordings.
The construction of power in family medicine bedside teaching: a video observation study
Rees CE, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe LV (2013)
Video and audio recordings of 7 bedside teaching encounters show power constructed through linguistic, para-linguistic, and non-verbal communication — questions, interruption, physical positioning. Demonstrates that video captures non-verbal and material dimensions of clinical teaching that audio-only research misses entirely.
Video feedback and debriefing in simulation,
OSCEs and skills training
Effectiveness of video-based peer feedback in self-training for skill acquisition among surgical residents
Lu C, Gong B, Zhang X, Wu C, Yang J (2025)
RCT of 33 surgical residents comparing video-based peer feedback against video-based expert feedback for wound dressing, catheterisation, and suturing. Both groups improved significantly; peer feedback matched expert feedback overall and outperformed it specifically for wound care — a resource-efficient alternative where expert time is scarce.
What is the learning effect of video review in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review
Robbrecht M, Van Winckel M, Mulder A, Embo M (2025)
Systematic review of 11 studies (4 RCTs, 7 pre-post designs) on video review of residents' own recorded consultations and procedures, all reaching Kirkpatrick level 2 or above — a strong umbrella reference tying together much of the evidence already on this page.
Effectiveness of video-assisted debriefing versus oral debriefing in simulation-based interdisciplinary health professions education
Rueda-Medina B,
Reina-Cabello JC,
Buendía-Castro M. (2024)
Directly supports video-assisted debriefing improving reflection and learner experience, matching Videolab’s simulation and debriefing use cases.
Comparative study on the impact of infographic versus video feedback on enhancing students' clinical skills in basic life support
Miri K, Yaghoubi A, Kholousi S, Yousofzadeh M, Zanganeh A, Gharayi M, Namazinia M (2024)
RCT of 76 nursing students comparing infographic-based education against video feedback for CPR/BLS training. The infographic group retained more knowledge; the video feedback group showed greater improvement in actual CPR skill performance — evidence for combining both formats.
Video-based approaches in health education: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Morgado M, Botelho J, Machado V, Mendes JJ, Adesope O, Proença L (2024)
Meta-analysis of 40 studies across five major databases finds video-based learning has a large effect on knowledge acquisition in dentistry (d=2.18) and a moderate effect in medicine (d=0.67), plus moderate effects on skills development in medicine (d=0.76) and nursing (d=0.59) — a comprehensive, high-quality evidence base for video-based learning generally.
Exploring effective video-review strategies of patient encounters for medical students
Park KY, Kang YJ, Park HK, Hwang HS (2024)
107 final-year medical students were randomised to precepted one-on-one video review or supervised peer-discussion video review after standardized-patient OSCE stations. Both methods improved OSCE scores and self-efficacy equally, though preceptor feedback drove higher satisfaction and larger gains among underperforming students.
Video feedback combined with peer role-playing: a method to improve the teaching effect of medical undergraduates
Wang J, Wang B, Liu D, Zhou Y, Xing X, Wang X, Gao W (2024)
Compares a video-feedback-plus-peer-role-play method against standard PPT-based feedback in a PBL curriculum for Chinese medical undergraduates. The intervention group scored significantly better on organisation, timeline planning, transition statements, and overall clinical interview performance, plus higher satisfaction.
Simulated video-based telehealth training for emergency physicians
Hayden EM, Nash CJ, Farrell SE (2023)
Validates video-based simulation as an effective way to train emergency physicians specifically in telehealth consultation skills, with outcomes comparable to in-person simulation training.
Applying a video recording, video-based rating method in OSCEs
Yu Fu, Wenjuan Zhang, Saiyi Zhang, Dong Hua, Di Xu & Hua Huang (2023)
Supports the legitimacy and reliability rationale for recorded OSCE scoring, re-review, and quality assurance, which underpins Videolab’s assessment and appeals positioning.
Remote, asynchronous training and feedback enables development of neurodynamic skills in physiotherapy students
Villagrán I, Rammsy F, Del Valle J, Gregorio de las Heras S, Pozo L, García P, Torres G, Varas J, Mandrusiak A, Corvetto M, Fuentes-Cimma J (2023)
Asynchronous remote training combined with expert video feedback enables physiotherapy students to acquire practical procedural (neurodynamic) skills at a level comparable to in-person instruction.
A video-based reflective design to prepare first-year pharmacy students for their first OSCE
Mak V, Malone D, Karunaratne N, Yao W, Randell L, Vu T (2022)
Structured video self-review before a student's first OSCE significantly reduces exam anxiety and improves performance on both communication and clinical-skill stations.
Effectiveness and quality of peer video feedback in health professions education: A systematic review
Zhang, H., Liao, A. W. X., Goh, S. H. L., Yoong, S. Q., Lim, A. X. M., & Wang, W. (2021)
Peer video feedback generally improved learner reactions and several learning outcomes versus other feedback modes, with implementation quality influencing impact. The review synthesizes practical design elements to raise feedback quality.
Using video to learn practical techniques in physiotherapy education
Rowe M, Sauls B (2020)
Video instruction for physiotherapy practical techniques achieves equivalent skill acquisition to in-person demonstration, with the added advantage of repeated, self-paced review.
Understanding and developing procedures for video-based assessment in medical education
Yeates P, Moult A, Lefroy J, Walsh-House J, Clews L, McKinley R, Fuller R (2020)
Design-based research across iteratively modified simulated OSCE stations shows that video-based assessment can produce examiner detachment and reduced volitional control, with validity mediated by the interaction between station content and camera set-up — practical guidance for anyone designing video-rated assessment.
Effectiveness of Video-Assisted Debriefing in Simulation-Based Health Professions Education
Zhang H, Mörelius E, Goh SHL, Wang W. (2019)
Across 23 studies, video-assisted debriefing improved learner experience, attitudes, and some performance outcomes. It was comparable to verbal debriefing for knowledge gain; effective designs used experienced debriefers, structured models, and 10–90 minute sessions.
Medical students' review of formative OSCE scores, checklists, and videos improves with student-faculty debriefing meetings
Bernard AW, Ceccolini G, Feinn R, Rockfeld J, Rosenberg I, Thomas L, Cassese T (2017)
After formative OSCEs, students reviewed scores (64%), checklists (42%), and videos (28%) in decreasing frequency — but structured student-faculty debriefing meetings significantly increased how often students engaged with all three, and reviewers went on to score better on subsequent OSCEs.
Feedback in formative OSCEs: comparison between direct observation and video-based formats
Junod Perron N, Louis-Simonet M, Cerutti B, Pfarrwaller E, Sommer J, Nendaz M. (2016)
This study compared feedback quality in formative OSCEs when given through direct observation versus video review. Video-based feedback prompted richer discussions about communication, professionalism, and clinical reasoning.
Feedback on video recorded consultations in medical teaching: why students loathe and love it
Nilsen S, Baerheim A (2005)
Qualitative focus-group study finds students experience reviewing video of their own consultations as anxiety-provoking — yet uniquely powerful for spotting communication patterns they'd never otherwise notice about themselves.
Video for patient information and education
Feasibility of a Remote Patient Video Education Intervention to Improve Care Coordination for Rural Cancer Patients
Okado I, Braun-Inglis C, Matsumoto K, Elhajj C, Cassel K, Berenberg J, Holcombe R (2024)
In a Hawaii pilot with rural, newly-diagnosed cancer patients, a tablet-based TED-talk-style video program improved the care-coordination communication domain (Cohen's d = −0.76) with uniformly high satisfaction.
Assessing patient-centred communication in teaching: a systematic review of instruments
Brouwers M, Rasenberg E, van Weel C, Laan R, van Weel-Baumgarten E. (2017)
A systematic review identifying 14 instruments for measuring patient-centred communication and warning that most still lack thorough validation
Shared decision-making (SDM)
and oncology consultations
AI-simulated patients for training shared decision-making: feasibility study in medical education
Herschbach L, Festl-Wietek T, Sonanini A, Holderried F, Albrecht T, Herrmann B, Herrmann-Werner A (2026)
Feasibility study of 58 medical students and physicians using a chatbot-based AI-simulated patient for SDM practice, finding high agreement between AI-generated and human OPTION-12 ratings (though AI ratings ran systematically higher) — a timely, modern complement to this page's more traditional SDM-training entries.
Shared decision-making interventions in neuro-oncology practice: a systematic review
Hughes J, Cozzi F, Phillips V & Price S (2025)
Hughes et al. review shared decision-making interventions in neuro-oncology, showing audiovisual tools improve patient understanding, values clarification, and satisfaction during complex treatment discussions.
A systematic review of shared decision making training programs for general practitioners
Jaeken A, Billiouw C, Mertens L, Van Bostraeten P, Bekkering G, Vermandere M, Aertgeerts B, van Mileghem L, Delvaux N (2024)
Systematic review of 29 SDM training programmes for GPs (eight databases, updated to September 2023) finds SDM training has a moderate impact on both patient- and observer-reported SDM skills, with blended learning formats outperforming online-only or live-only training.
Evaluation of a multilevel implementation program for timeout and shared decision making in breast cancer care
van Veenendaal, H., Voogdt-Pruis, H. R., Ubbink, D. T., van Weele, E., Koco, L., Schuurman, M., et al. (2022)
Across 11 hospital teams, a multilevel program drove SDM adoption (96% of clinicians endorsed it) via a 4-step model — time and resources the main barriers.
Effectiveness of Individual Feedback and Coaching on Shared Decision-making Consultations in Oncology Care
van Veenendaal H, Rietjens JAC, van der Velden LA, Henselmans I, Aarts MJC, de Haes HCJM, et al. (2022)
A theory-based, multilevel program with training, practical tools, feedback, and workflow redesign supported SDM uptake across teams; time and resources were common barriers.
Shared decision making in cancer treatment: Dutch national survey on patients’ preferences and perceptions
Kuijpers MMT, van Veenendaal H, Engelen V, Visserman E, Noteboom EA, Stiggelbout AM, et al. (2021)
Dutch national survey of 3,254 cancer patients: 84.5% rated the option to decline further treatment as very important, but only 28% felt it was actually discussed.
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals
Légaré F, Adekpedjou R, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, Lyddiatt A, Politi MC, Thomson R, Elwyn G, Donner-Banzhoff N (2018)
Cochrane review (updating the 2010 and 2014 versions) examining training and multifaceted interventions to improve clinicians' uptake of SDM — the field's highest-evidence-tier synthesis on "what actually gets clinicians to practice SDM."
Accelerating implementation of SDM in the Netherlands: exploratory investigation
van Veenendaal H, van der Weijden T, Ubbink DT, Stiggelbout AM, van Mierlo LA, Hilders CG. (2018)
Proposes national-level strategies to scale SDM, including clinician motivation, patient empowerment, and supportive socio-political contexts.
A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process
Elwyn G, Durand MA, Song J, Aarts J, Barr PJ, Berger Z, Cochran N, Frosch D, Galasiński D, Gulbrandsen P, Han PKJ, Härter M, Kinnersley P, Lloyd A, Mishra M, Perestelo-Perez L, Scholl I, Tomori K, Trevena L, Witteman HO, Van der Weijden T (2017)
Updates the 2012 model into Team Talk (introduce options and goals), Option Talk (compare options with decision aids), and Decision Talk (deliberate on informed preferences) — the current standard reference model for SDM consultations.
Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme
Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Edwards A, Stobbart L, Tomson D, Macphail S, Dodd C, Brain K, Elwyn G, Thomson R (2017)
Perspective on scaling SDM across the NHS through the MAGIC ("Making Good Decisions in Collaboration") programme, identifying six key implementation barriers and matching strategies — a useful UK-system parallel to the Dutch implementation paper already on this page.
Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument
Couët N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, Vaillancourt H, Leblanc A, Turcotte S, Elwyn G, Légaré F (2015)
Systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument — a scale for rating how much patients are actually involved in decisions, often scored from recorded consultations — finding SDM remains inconsistently practiced across clinical contexts.
Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice
Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, Cording E, Tomson D, Dodd C, Rollnick S, Edwards A, Barry M (2012)
Proposes the influential three-step SDM model — choice talk, option talk, decision talk — giving clinicians a practical, teachable framework for implementing shared decision-making across diverse clinical contexts. One of the two foundational Elwyn model papers; oddly absent from the page given how much of the SDM literature here builds on it.